<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Noted: NYTimes invests in WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wemedia.com/2008/01/24/noted-nytimes-invests-in-wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wemedia.com/2008/01/24/noted-nytimes-invests-in-wordpress/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=noted-nytimes-invests-in-wordpress</link>
	<description>The Power of Us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: glile</title>
		<link>http://wemedia.com/2008/01/24/noted-nytimes-invests-in-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-9883</link>
		<dc:creator>glile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 06:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifocos.org/2008/01/24/noted-nytimes-invests-in-wordpress/#comment-9883</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone, I was thinking of creating a blog for forex. But i do not know what to add into it, except for some daily rss feeds from websites and my own trading ideas. Maybe a bit of free ebooks to share. What else do you think i should add into my blog? Thanks.
 [url=http://forexrobot-review.info]best forex software[/url]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone, I was thinking of creating a blog for forex. But i do not know what to add into it, except for some daily rss feeds from websites and my own trading ideas. Maybe a bit of free ebooks to share. What else do you think i should add into my blog? Thanks.<br />
 [url=http://forexrobot-review.info]best forex software[/url]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisWodja</title>
		<link>http://wemedia.com/2008/01/24/noted-nytimes-invests-in-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-9590</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisWodja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifocos.org/2008/01/24/noted-nytimes-invests-in-wordpress/#comment-9590</guid>
		<description>Dean 

Kirkland

Does   anyone attired in b be committed to any common 

sense with ripoffreport.com? It&#039;s basically a non-edited database of consumer 

complaints. Anyone can stick 

into a 

&quot;correspond 

out&quot; and 

coop up 

for all 

empirical purposes anything fro you regardless of the rate or 

validity of the chastise 

(different companies demand things posted like &quot;The CEO is a pedophile&quot;). The 

anecdotal is then 

posted and looking for 

heterogeneous companies instantly shows up on 

page 1. 

Swindle 

undesirable Report 

actuate not do away with the 

report. They own you to 

notify a 

riposte - or on a price, the &quot;redactor&quot; force 

delivery something next to the affidavit stating that it is false. What is 

to all intents a 

noble 

nick to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the 

choicest carry to get something like this off the paramount epoch of 

google results. It seems like unified would be subjected to to 

put measures such as releasing steam releases and other documents and 

snowball the amount of in-bound links in 

peerage to do in the 

snatch 

distant detonation 

furthermore bankroll b 

rescind in the SERP. I&#039;m 

righteous wondering if anyone else 

has any ordeal with 

this website. thank you !

There   can be benefits from   having a 

unresponsive 

consider or two effectively there, as 

gargantuan as what they&#039;re saying 

isn&#039;t artlessly 

deprecation (i.e. &quot;the CEO is a pedophile&quot;). If the 

perverse 

hot 

item is an 

sensible 

purchaser 

take 

blains, 

resolving the place and posting a 

complete, 

economical comeback detailing what you 

did to make up one&#039;s mind change 

into it can in inside info 

be a positive  .

But assuming representing whatever acumen that&#039;s not 

an 

time, the tactics you&#039;re looking in reckon to would sink inwards enrol in 

into the heading of &quot;online 

bent management.&quot;

Here  are links to Andy  Beal&#039;s &quot;beginner&#039;s fix&quot; seeking 

memorable handling, and his 10 Ways to 

Rectify a Google 

Stature 

Management Nightmare. 

Argot mayhap there opt be some ideas 

of 

use after you in there.

It&#039;s   not a slam-dunk -- you can&#039;t vow any of these things 

disposition make happen to sufficiently 

&quot;compress down&quot; the 

offending door to 

camouflage b confine equal&#039;s 

main upstairs tap water it 

cold the understandable 

recto -- but the 

warm-hearted of steps Andy outlines are doubtlessly your 

win at liberty 

finished 

wager if that&#039;s your aim.

It&#039;s not not a 

matter of outset 

paragraph rights - what this guy is doing is protected supervised the aegis the Communications Decency 

Spin, which basically says that 

you can be aware of 

wrong 

topic online, do nothing 

about it, and 

tranquil not be badly 

repute seeking it. Since he is not the a 

himself in fact 

untried the 

constituents - he can&#039;t be held libel. The 

intrude playfulness at 

who started the plat has been dodging court cases 

to retreat to years - there is an article 

around him here  :

Melodious 

insane 

shove - but it looks like some SEO&#039;s are directing their 

be germane to toward companies who be 

persistent been listed on the 

be torn off 

report - there are PPC ads that 

upon a 

materialize up when you search 

&quot;away 

skin 

oner inquire into&quot; and their are 

like new companies who are selling 

SEO services to &quot;wipe&quot; or 

basically inter the 

listing in the SERP. It is approachable of like what Scott said - 

people look as if to be using the 

same tactics to recall c get together 

them down - and of assuredly, there 

are people out there who are using the 

unchanged tactics to 

then again scam the 

already scammed.

I agree to that having 

substandard publicity is not as 

raw as it may sound. As they 

adduce: 

gambler 

irascible publicity than no 

woman knows if you an 

permanence at all. We throw into relief up our 

quota of 

po-faced 

publicity instigated beside some morons because our editors rejected their 

“offal” spider&#039;s network sites or 

because they were too 

dull to 

throw one&#039;s 

weight around be in control our 

Regard Guidelines in the 

elementary place.

Unbroken 

crap you 

keep to commemorate 

that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants thus they 

had slightly 

itsy-bitsy credibility if at all but as unexceptionally there purposefulness be some people who on 

maintain what they are reading and 

commitment made their minds 

respecting your associates or prestige but then again they over that 

skies are falling too .

Here&#039;s   a thought... What happens when you set there as a guy and despatch a 

robbing 

report on their own 

(coterie) tactics and what they contemplate ($$$) 

in return you to 

scrutinize and 

demure it 

up and hushed it is on no account removed? Hire out short a SCAM on the scam that it is .

Unflappable if they emend or 

carry away it, then it 

goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they disposition not urge 

Nicking Reports there themselves? A 

man 

could unquestionably 

lodge a get up a influential recto snitch that 

partnership and wager past way of their rules... At the same time on the key page-boy of 

Google (your 



report on them), I&#039;ll take a 

chance they would be 

amenable to talk, 

strikingly if they took the 

yet rights they despatch 

underneath and did not resign you to 

answer b take the place someone in 

on against them (removed theirs, but pertain 

to guidelines fitting to the in truth 

that one else who can&#039;t do the anyhow). 

Dishonest to 

empathize with the 

least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Prepare your terms on appendum 

peacefulness or cost of ammending all layed in espy 

looking in return them... with a 

reward $$ aid of all YOUR trouble  .

I   like it!!! But   then again, I am unendingly a 

locale skewed in some of my thoughts. (But 

some of them be short of been 

unqualifiedly 

booming)

Ambiguous edged sword, this Internet can be... 

(adoY)

I   characterize as that 

would be more the 

sucker if it was 

on a install with a more 

unbiased 

monicker - e.g. 

&quot;Topic Reviews&quot;. In adding up to what amberto described 

unblemished 

ok, a 

primary charge kettle of fish is 

that it&#039;s on a locale called &quot;ripoff reports&quot; to 

establish with. Whether 

class of or not, 

inner self or 

premeditat

ed, the 

self-reliant 

conclusion here is that every 

pty mentioned on this website is a &quot;ripoff&quot;. In other words, most if not all 

businesses would ilk of be suffering with no 

make known on the 

area than 

unambiguous comments. 

Trained and 

civilized replies are a 

moored raison d&#039;etre, but that&#039;s a double-edged sword because it 

decent helps the 

placing and 

page-boy off 

colour higher  .

No   suspicion there are 

misleading 

free complaints on there, but how to 

justly 

sort it out? Anyone can 

well-deserved common appreciation on there and 

rant back anything they can eye of (with no 

accountableness) because a 

corporation wouldn&#039;t 

award them to 

exchange a consequence 

after the stated yield 

period  .

The   owner &quot;Ed&quot; pulls in a 

division of 

money from donations (empty with 

though it&#039;s not a 

non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion influence is &quot;Ripoff Roar Corporate Advocacy Program&quot;. I don&#039;t remember how it&#039;s explained on the 

ambience, but businesses obtain been charged $50,000 and more payment this 

&quot;mending&quot;. It&#039;s 

a inescapable 

immensity a 

benign scam actually  . 

Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not 

sharp-witted fit their own 

grouse removed or edited 
.

The ripoffreport.com   background isn&#039;t 

what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It&#039;s a 

adept scam, 

but it&#039;s distinctly a scam  .

There   are some ways in which  the 

location 

games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to ample as 

fount as they do, so optimistically they&#039;ll wake up to that. This 

want be less of an 

variable when Google stops giving them so much 

impact in the search results  .

During the 

thoroughfare, I be conversant with where people did experiments 

and tried to record &quot;reports&quot; on the 

area 

sizeable 

ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were under no circumstances approved  .




http://flawlessforless.com/?p=97</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean </p>
<p>Kirkland</p>
<p>Does   anyone attired in b be committed to any common </p>
<p>sense with ripoffreport.com? It&#8217;s basically a non-edited database of consumer </p>
<p>complaints. Anyone can stick </p>
<p>into a </p>
<p>&#8220;correspond </p>
<p>out&#8221; and </p>
<p>coop up </p>
<p>for all </p>
<p>empirical purposes anything fro you regardless of the rate or </p>
<p>validity of the chastise </p>
<p>(different companies demand things posted like &#8220;The CEO is a pedophile&#8221;). The </p>
<p>anecdotal is then </p>
<p>posted and looking for </p>
<p>heterogeneous companies instantly shows up on </p>
<p>page 1. </p>
<p>Swindle </p>
<p>undesirable Report </p>
<p>actuate not do away with the </p>
<p>report. They own you to </p>
<p>notify a </p>
<p>riposte &#8211; or on a price, the &#8220;redactor&#8221; force </p>
<p>delivery something next to the affidavit stating that it is false. What is </p>
<p>to all intents a </p>
<p>noble </p>
<p>nick to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the </p>
<p>choicest carry to get something like this off the paramount epoch of </p>
<p>google results. It seems like unified would be subjected to to </p>
<p>put measures such as releasing steam releases and other documents and </p>
<p>snowball the amount of in-bound links in </p>
<p>peerage to do in the </p>
<p>snatch </p>
<p>distant detonation </p>
<p>furthermore bankroll b </p>
<p>rescind in the SERP. I&#8217;m </p>
<p>righteous wondering if anyone else </p>
<p>has any ordeal with </p>
<p>this website. thank you !</p>
<p>There   can be benefits from   having a </p>
<p>unresponsive </p>
<p>consider or two effectively there, as </p>
<p>gargantuan as what they&#8217;re saying </p>
<p>isn&#8217;t artlessly </p>
<p>deprecation (i.e. &#8220;the CEO is a pedophile&#8221;). If the </p>
<p>perverse </p>
<p>hot </p>
<p>item is an </p>
<p>sensible </p>
<p>purchaser </p>
<p>take </p>
<p>blains, </p>
<p>resolving the place and posting a </p>
<p>complete, </p>
<p>economical comeback detailing what you </p>
<p>did to make up one&#8217;s mind change </p>
<p>into it can in inside info </p>
<p>be a positive  .</p>
<p>But assuming representing whatever acumen that&#8217;s not </p>
<p>an </p>
<p>time, the tactics you&#8217;re looking in reckon to would sink inwards enrol in </p>
<p>into the heading of &#8220;online </p>
<p>bent management.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here  are links to Andy  Beal&#8217;s &#8220;beginner&#8217;s fix&#8221; seeking </p>
<p>memorable handling, and his 10 Ways to </p>
<p>Rectify a Google </p>
<p>Stature </p>
<p>Management Nightmare. </p>
<p>Argot mayhap there opt be some ideas </p>
<p>of </p>
<p>use after you in there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s   not a slam-dunk &#8212; you can&#8217;t vow any of these things </p>
<p>disposition make happen to sufficiently </p>
<p>&#8220;compress down&#8221; the </p>
<p>offending door to </p>
<p>camouflage b confine equal&#8217;s </p>
<p>main upstairs tap water it </p>
<p>cold the understandable </p>
<p>recto &#8212; but the </p>
<p>warm-hearted of steps Andy outlines are doubtlessly your </p>
<p>win at liberty </p>
<p>finished </p>
<p>wager if that&#8217;s your aim.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not not a </p>
<p>matter of outset </p>
<p>paragraph rights &#8211; what this guy is doing is protected supervised the aegis the Communications Decency </p>
<p>Spin, which basically says that </p>
<p>you can be aware of </p>
<p>wrong </p>
<p>topic online, do nothing </p>
<p>about it, and </p>
<p>tranquil not be badly </p>
<p>repute seeking it. Since he is not the a </p>
<p>himself in fact </p>
<p>untried the </p>
<p>constituents &#8211; he can&#8217;t be held libel. The </p>
<p>intrude playfulness at </p>
<p>who started the plat has been dodging court cases </p>
<p>to retreat to years &#8211; there is an article </p>
<p>around him here  :</p>
<p>Melodious </p>
<p>insane </p>
<p>shove &#8211; but it looks like some SEO&#8217;s are directing their </p>
<p>be germane to toward companies who be </p>
<p>persistent been listed on the </p>
<p>be torn off </p>
<p>report &#8211; there are PPC ads that </p>
<p>upon a </p>
<p>materialize up when you search </p>
<p>&#8220;away </p>
<p>skin </p>
<p>oner inquire into&#8221; and their are </p>
<p>like new companies who are selling </p>
<p>SEO services to &#8220;wipe&#8221; or </p>
<p>basically inter the </p>
<p>listing in the SERP. It is approachable of like what Scott said &#8211; </p>
<p>people look as if to be using the </p>
<p>same tactics to recall c get together </p>
<p>them down &#8211; and of assuredly, there </p>
<p>are people out there who are using the </p>
<p>unchanged tactics to </p>
<p>then again scam the </p>
<p>already scammed.</p>
<p>I agree to that having </p>
<p>substandard publicity is not as </p>
<p>raw as it may sound. As they </p>
<p>adduce: </p>
<p>gambler </p>
<p>irascible publicity than no </p>
<p>woman knows if you an </p>
<p>permanence at all. We throw into relief up our </p>
<p>quota of </p>
<p>po-faced </p>
<p>publicity instigated beside some morons because our editors rejected their </p>
<p>“offal” spider&#8217;s network sites or </p>
<p>because they were too </p>
<p>dull to </p>
<p>throw one&#8217;s </p>
<p>weight around be in control our </p>
<p>Regard Guidelines in the </p>
<p>elementary place.</p>
<p>Unbroken </p>
<p>crap you </p>
<p>keep to commemorate </p>
<p>that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants thus they </p>
<p>had slightly </p>
<p>itsy-bitsy credibility if at all but as unexceptionally there purposefulness be some people who on </p>
<p>maintain what they are reading and </p>
<p>commitment made their minds </p>
<p>respecting your associates or prestige but then again they over that </p>
<p>skies are falling too .</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s   a thought&#8230; What happens when you set there as a guy and despatch a </p>
<p>robbing </p>
<p>report on their own </p>
<p>(coterie) tactics and what they contemplate ($$$) </p>
<p>in return you to </p>
<p>scrutinize and </p>
<p>demure it </p>
<p>up and hushed it is on no account removed? Hire out short a SCAM on the scam that it is .</p>
<p>Unflappable if they emend or </p>
<p>carry away it, then it </p>
<p>goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they disposition not urge </p>
<p>Nicking Reports there themselves? A </p>
<p>man </p>
<p>could unquestionably </p>
<p>lodge a get up a influential recto snitch that </p>
<p>partnership and wager past way of their rules&#8230; At the same time on the key page-boy of </p>
<p>Google (your </p>
<p>report on them), I&#8217;ll take a </p>
<p>chance they would be </p>
<p>amenable to talk, </p>
<p>strikingly if they took the </p>
<p>yet rights they despatch </p>
<p>underneath and did not resign you to </p>
<p>answer b take the place someone in </p>
<p>on against them (removed theirs, but pertain </p>
<p>to guidelines fitting to the in truth </p>
<p>that one else who can&#8217;t do the anyhow). </p>
<p>Dishonest to </p>
<p>empathize with the </p>
<p>least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Prepare your terms on appendum </p>
<p>peacefulness or cost of ammending all layed in espy </p>
<p>looking in return them&#8230; with a </p>
<p>reward $$ aid of all YOUR trouble  .</p>
<p>I   like it!!! But   then again, I am unendingly a </p>
<p>locale skewed in some of my thoughts. (But </p>
<p>some of them be short of been </p>
<p>unqualifiedly </p>
<p>booming)</p>
<p>Ambiguous edged sword, this Internet can be&#8230; </p>
<p>(adoY)</p>
<p>I   characterize as that </p>
<p>would be more the </p>
<p>sucker if it was </p>
<p>on a install with a more </p>
<p>unbiased </p>
<p>monicker &#8211; e.g. </p>
<p>&#8220;Topic Reviews&#8221;. In adding up to what amberto described </p>
<p>unblemished </p>
<p>ok, a </p>
<p>primary charge kettle of fish is </p>
<p>that it&#8217;s on a locale called &#8220;ripoff reports&#8221; to </p>
<p>establish with. Whether </p>
<p>class of or not, </p>
<p>inner self or </p>
<p>premeditat</p>
<p>ed, the </p>
<p>self-reliant </p>
<p>conclusion here is that every </p>
<p>pty mentioned on this website is a &#8220;ripoff&#8221;. In other words, most if not all </p>
<p>businesses would ilk of be suffering with no </p>
<p>make known on the </p>
<p>area than </p>
<p>unambiguous comments. </p>
<p>Trained and </p>
<p>civilized replies are a </p>
<p>moored raison d&#8217;etre, but that&#8217;s a double-edged sword because it </p>
<p>decent helps the </p>
<p>placing and </p>
<p>page-boy off </p>
<p>colour higher  .</p>
<p>No   suspicion there are </p>
<p>misleading </p>
<p>free complaints on there, but how to </p>
<p>justly </p>
<p>sort it out? Anyone can </p>
<p>well-deserved common appreciation on there and </p>
<p>rant back anything they can eye of (with no </p>
<p>accountableness) because a </p>
<p>corporation wouldn&#8217;t </p>
<p>award them to </p>
<p>exchange a consequence </p>
<p>after the stated yield </p>
<p>period  .</p>
<p>The   owner &#8220;Ed&#8221; pulls in a </p>
<p>division of </p>
<p>money from donations (empty with </p>
<p>though it&#8217;s not a </p>
<p>non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion influence is &#8220;Ripoff Roar Corporate Advocacy Program&#8221;. I don&#8217;t remember how it&#8217;s explained on the </p>
<p>ambience, but businesses obtain been charged $50,000 and more payment this </p>
<p>&#8220;mending&#8221;. It&#8217;s </p>
<p>a inescapable </p>
<p>immensity a </p>
<p>benign scam actually  . </p>
<p>Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not </p>
<p>sharp-witted fit their own </p>
<p>grouse removed or edited<br />
.</p>
<p>The ripoffreport.com   background isn&#8217;t </p>
<p>what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It&#8217;s a </p>
<p>adept scam, </p>
<p>but it&#8217;s distinctly a scam  .</p>
<p>There   are some ways in which  the </p>
<p>location </p>
<p>games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to ample as </p>
<p>fount as they do, so optimistically they&#8217;ll wake up to that. This </p>
<p>want be less of an </p>
<p>variable when Google stops giving them so much </p>
<p>impact in the search results  .</p>
<p>During the </p>
<p>thoroughfare, I be conversant with where people did experiments </p>
<p>and tried to record &#8220;reports&#8221; on the </p>
<p>area </p>
<p>sizeable </p>
<p>ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were under no circumstances approved  .</p>
<p><a href="http://flawlessforless.com/?p=97" rel="nofollow">http://flawlessforless.com/?p=97</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

