<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clemens, Kindle and Congress: History rhymes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wemedia.com/2009/05/08/clemens-kindle-and-congress-history-rhymes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wemedia.com/2009/05/08/clemens-kindle-and-congress-history-rhymes/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=clemens-kindle-and-congress-history-rhymes</link>
	<description>The Power of Us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Schaffran</title>
		<link>http://wemedia.com/2009/05/08/clemens-kindle-and-congress-history-rhymes/comment-page-1/#comment-6156</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Schaffran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wemedia.com/?p=3992#comment-6156</guid>
		<description>While it doesn&#039;t do violence to the thrust of Dale&#039;s post, the facts are that Clemens did not invest in the Linotype machine. Sadly, he invested and lost everything and more in the Paige typesetter, a cockamamie invention that was intended to be a robot type setter, picking letters from a case of type and putting them in a slug, one at a time. It had thousands of moving parts. He was rescued penury by Henry Rogers, Rockefeller&#039;s #2, who deftly parked the copyrights with Clemens wife Olivia.  Google &quot;clemens typesetter&quot; 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it doesn&#039;t do violence to the thrust of Dale&#039;s post, the facts are that Clemens did not invest in the Linotype machine. Sadly, he invested and lost everything and more in the Paige typesetter, a cockamamie invention that was intended to be a robot type setter, picking letters from a case of type and putting them in a slug, one at a time. It had thousands of moving parts. He was rescued penury by Henry Rogers, Rockefeller&#039;s #2, who deftly parked the copyrights with Clemens wife Olivia.  Google &quot;clemens typesetter&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devoniuk</title>
		<link>http://wemedia.com/2009/05/08/clemens-kindle-and-congress-history-rhymes/comment-page-1/#comment-6147</link>
		<dc:creator>devoniuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wemedia.com/?p=3992#comment-6147</guid>
		<description>As a new Kindle user (and fan) I have to say that I have been listening actively to the newspaper industry crisis and wondering...&quot;When are people going to grok the Kindle??!!&quot; It is an amazing way to get the newspaper delivered daily, with ultimate convenience, no debris (read: stacks of papers sitting around), and an incredibly beautiful interface that provides tremendous ease of navigation and reading. I LOVE reading a newspaper, but have been subscribing to the Washington Post for about 2 months now. I now cannot imagine being willing to get the paper otherwise. I will also say that I have NEVER subscribed to a newspaper before now and I never read the news online through a given paper&#039;s website. Too many ads, too hard to find what you&#039;re looking for, etc., can&#039;t easily clip things out...AND, it&#039;s a screen. The Kindle is not an illuminated screen so it doesn&#039;t tire your eyes.  
 
I will also say that as a frequent traveler, I am asked regularly about my Kindle -- and when I talk about the newspaper stuff, people get really excited and see the benefits. More than one has said it could save the newspaper industry. Far-fetched? Perhaps. But I sure hope that someone is thinking about it besides me! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a new Kindle user (and fan) I have to say that I have been listening actively to the newspaper industry crisis and wondering&#8230;&quot;When are people going to grok the Kindle??!!&quot; It is an amazing way to get the newspaper delivered daily, with ultimate convenience, no debris (read: stacks of papers sitting around), and an incredibly beautiful interface that provides tremendous ease of navigation and reading. I LOVE reading a newspaper, but have been subscribing to the Washington Post for about 2 months now. I now cannot imagine being willing to get the paper otherwise. I will also say that I have NEVER subscribed to a newspaper before now and I never read the news online through a given paper&#039;s website. Too many ads, too hard to find what you&#039;re looking for, etc., can&#039;t easily clip things out&#8230;AND, it&#039;s a screen. The Kindle is not an illuminated screen so it doesn&#039;t tire your eyes.  </p>
<p>I will also say that as a frequent traveler, I am asked regularly about my Kindle &#8212; and when I talk about the newspaper stuff, people get really excited and see the benefits. More than one has said it could save the newspaper industry. Far-fetched? Perhaps. But I sure hope that someone is thinking about it besides me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://wemedia.com/2009/05/08/clemens-kindle-and-congress-history-rhymes/comment-page-1/#comment-6143</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wemedia.com/?p=3992#comment-6143</guid>
		<description>It is not unreasonable to expect Google to share the wealth with content producers. After all, without newspapers, bloggers, porn sites, whatever, putting interesting material on the Web, all you&#039;d have left would be online stores and government sites, and how much fun -- and profitable for our Googly overlords -- would that be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not unreasonable to expect Google to share the wealth with content producers. After all, without newspapers, bloggers, porn sites, whatever, putting interesting material on the Web, all you&#8217;d have left would be online stores and government sites, and how much fun &#8212; and profitable for our Googly overlords &#8212; would that be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clemens, Kindle and Congress: History rhymes &#124; Iuod.com - Latest ipod, iphone news</title>
		<link>http://wemedia.com/2009/05/08/clemens-kindle-and-congress-history-rhymes/comment-page-1/#comment-6124</link>
		<dc:creator>Clemens, Kindle and Congress: History rhymes &#124; Iuod.com - Latest ipod, iphone news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 06:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wemedia.com/?p=3992#comment-6124</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more from the original source: Clemens, Kindle and Congress: History rhymes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more from the original source: Clemens, Kindle and Congress: History rhymes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

