The Power of Us

Freakamedia: The limits of the connected culture

As the UK economy suffers its worst crisis in 60 years and some of the world’s biggest private financial institutions crumble beneath the crash of the U.S. housing market, we can’t help but reflect on the notion of enlightened anxiety.

That’s a phrase Dale used in the introduction to our original We Media report, published more than five years ago. It’s the sick feeling you get when you put together what you know with what you don’t know. It’s the downside of the connected society: we have access to more information than ever and it makes us crazy.

For instance: You’ve heard that massive investment institutions such as Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch and AIG have their fingers in just about everything. They’ve somehow amassed tens of billions of dollars in losses due to investments in things related to home loans. Some of these “things” are called mortgage-backed securities. Maybe six months ago you caught wind of AIG’s woes – auditors warned of them. Reuters, Bloomberg and others reported the findings. Or maybe you ignored it. After all, what are you supposed to do when auditors question accounting methods and asset valuations at a banking insurance company? And what, exactly, are housing-related securities? Who buys and sells them and why are the world’s financiers and governments freaking out over them? Should you be freaking out? What’s next to fall? Your bank, your retirement savings, your home or your government?

Sorry, the FAQ at Merrill Lynch doesn’t help with those kinds of questions. But who does? Will We Media help dig us out from this or any crisis, or is that asking too much of everyone? That’s old-fashioned dig, by the way. You won’t find references to any of these questions among the top posts on the website Digg in the last 24 hours, 7 days, 30 days or year.

So dig further. Today, your favorite big media brand is flush with play-by-play reports and day-after analysis of who’s involved in the housing-banking-crumbling economy story, and why some companies are too important to fail but others are not. Yours? Probably not. MSNBC asks, “What does the Crisis Mean for You?” and an economist answers: “At this point it’s really, really hard to see how things are going to sort out … Clearly, these are very uncertain times…”

Clearly.

For all that we know, there seems to be an equal and opposing counterforce of all that we do not know. So we’re all freaking out. Three years ago Steven Leavitt and Stephen Dubner wrote a book called Freakonomics to describe the strange disconnect between financial assumptions, risks and reality. What they called “the hidden side of everything” might just as easliy be called freakamedia. Information rains down on us from media everywhere, but there’s still a hidden side to everything.

Investor and serial entrepreneur Mark Andreesen, most recently founder of the social network Ning, wrote four months ago in his blog, “High-quality business journalism is distinctly the exception, not the rule; every CEO knows it, and the noise from inaccurate bad press can again actually damage your company.”

He reflects a deep-seeded distrust of media – borne out by our research that has found a vast majority of Americans are unsatisfied with the quality of their journalism.

But We Media is everyone – journalism from big institutions, alerts from governments, research from activists and insights from individuals empowered to produce, share, distribute and act on information produced by everyone. The gaps between information, knowledge and action remain wide, at least for our biggest challenges. We Media didn’t help the world avoid a housing slump in the U.S. and Europe, or wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Georgia and Darfur. While the opportunities to change the world through media produced by everyone remain limitless, the results, so far, have been distinctly limited.

Andrew Nachison

Andrew Nachison

Andrew is co-founder of We Media and of iFOCOS, a media think tank and futures lab. Find him on LinkedIn.

Website - Twitter - Facebook - More Posts

  • http://mlncn.com/ Benjamin Melançon

    Douglas Rushkoff covers what we can actually do pretty well, given that

    the money is itself crap. It’s based on a centralized lending scheme and has no intrinsic value. The Fed no longer even releases the metric telling us how much money is out there.

    All this means is that you can’t count on capitalism anymore. Your wealth is not how many paper assets you have. It’s not even how much land you have (or think you have). It’s what you can do. It’s your value to other people.

    The real economy need not suffer in the downfall of the speculative economy. If anything, the real economy has been repressed by the speculative economy. Real farmers have been crushed by Big Agra, real druggists have been crushed by Wal-Mart and real transportation alternatives have been crushed by Big Oil and Big Auto.

    The opportunity here, while the big boys are down, is to rebuild the genuine, local commercial infrastructure. To make shoes, clothes, food, education, healthcare and everything else we can in a bottom-up fashion.

    Read Rushkoff’s whole post.

  • Pingback: The Limits Of The Connected Culture « WiredPen

  • http://thebeadpeople.org Milt Lee

    I’ve read your post 3 times now, and I think I understand what you are saying, but some of your references seem to be related to things that I don’t really understand. You talk about “Dig”. I’ve heard this term, but I’ve never bothered to go to the digg website, so I couldn’t really say what it does at all. This is not meant to be a slam on your post – I think these questions and observations need to be brought up. I just feel that frequently the people who report or comment on these things are so caught up in their own world of reporting that they forget that there are people who don’t pay that close attention to everything that is coming towards them.

    As for the economic reporting, I frequently listen to the folks at NPR. I generally like to listen to those people, but I am constantly amazed at how little they understand what’s actually going on with everyday people’s lives. In South Dakota, where I’m from, many people have 2 or 3 jobs just to get by. But on the radio, I hear people who are making 80 to 100 thousand dollars a year ask in wonderment, “why are people upset about the economy? The financial indicators all say it’s a good time in America” Even 2 days ago there was a report of the good news that the economy was growing. Well, for people with jobs (good jobs) it’s just not in their world view that many people are working 60 to 80 hrs a week to put food on the table. But when you have fewer people working that much harder, then productivity goes up! It doesn’t mean that the economy is better off – it means that companies can get by with fewer people because they work the ones they have harder, and so the bottom line looks better.
    Milt Lee

  • http://www.ifocos.org Andrew Nachison

    Milt, thanks. You’re right on all fronts, and, by the way, I lived in Rapid City for a couple of years. As for Digg (two g’s), I could have explained it and why I referenced it. It’s a web site (www.digg.com) that collects reading recommendations from people who see stories they think others should read. You could, for instance, click on the “Digg This” link above (among the share/save this icons following my post). If enough people “Digg” a story it will appear on the home page of http://www.digg.com – and more people will read the post. It’s importaht as a reference point for how information flows online – a system of “collaborative filtering” that eliminates professional editors but instead relies on everyone – or, more accurately, anyone – to decide which news deserves the most attention.

More in Culture (15 of 15 articles)


...